Welcome to Spaceempires.net
Login or Register

Search

Modules
 Home

 Discussions
 Forums
 Members List
 SE IRC Chat
 SEnet News
 Newsletter
 News by Topic
 News Archive
 Submit News
 Files & Links
 Downloads
 Shipyards
 Upload File
 Web Links
 SEnet Content
 Content (Stories)
 FAQ
 Game Info
 Hangman
 ModWorks
 Top 10
 Strategy
 Surveys
 User Content
 Fan Fiction
 Image Gallery
 Pages
 SE.net Info
 Feedback
 Recommend Us
 Statistics
 Search
 Staff
 Your Info
 Journal
 Private Messages
 Your Account

User Info
· Welcome, Anonymous
Membership:
· New: Darth_Wreck
· New Today: 1
· New Yesterday: 1
· Overall: 1783

People Online:
· Visitors: 83
· Members: 0
· Total: 83

  

Spaceempires.net :: Retrofit Max Percent Difference in Cost useless? :: View topic
Forum FAQ :: Search :: Memberlist :: Usergroups :: Profile :: Log in to check your private messages :: Log in


Retrofit Max Percent Difference in Cost useless?

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Spaceempires.net Forum Index -> Balance Mod
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
BlueTemplar
Space Emperor


Joined: Mar 27, 2007

PostPosted: Tue Nov 20, 2007 6:44 pm    Post subject: Retrofit Max Percent Difference in Cost useless? Reply with quote

http://spaceempires5.com/en-US/node/2738#comment-31779

IMHO it would be a good idea to set Retrofit Max Percent Difference in Cost really high.

Less micromanagement for the player, and an easier retrofit system for the AI.

If you actually shouldn't be able to make all the retrofits in a single turn, maybe it would be a better idea instead to balance the retrofit costs?
Make them higher than this:
Retrofit Cost Percent For Comps := 120
Retrofit Cost Percent For Comp Removal := 30


Last edited by BlueTemplar on Wed Nov 21, 2007 8:09 pm; edited 1 time in total


Back to top
CaptainKwok
Balance Guru


Joined: Aug 04, 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada

PostPosted: Tue Nov 20, 2007 7:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

If you have a high retrofit cost difference allowed, then you end up forcing all players (specifically PBWers) to use retroseries building - which involves more micromanaging then retrofitting does now.

I don't often hit the 50% cost difference limit myself - what types of situations are you finding this in?


Space Empires Depot | SE:V Balance Mod


Back to top
BlueTemplar
Space Emperor


Joined: Mar 27, 2007

PostPosted: Wed Nov 21, 2007 1:20 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

In the early game, when I haven't maxed out my production yet, I build exclusively via retroseries. I also use retroseries any time I need lots of ships built really fast, which happens quite often.

Back to top
Fyron
Galactic Guru


Joined: Aug 04, 2003
Location: CA, USA

PostPosted: Wed Nov 21, 2007 8:56 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Retroseries should be discouraged, not encouraged...

Smarter than your average Texrak.


Back to top
BlueTemplar
Space Emperor


Joined: Mar 27, 2007

PostPosted: Wed Nov 21, 2007 5:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

That's why I propose to remove this "limitation", BUT increase the cost of retrofitting. I amost feel like cheating right now, except for all the annoying micromanagement (edit: and all the necessary repair infrastructure, which makes retroseries not completely overpowered).

Last edited by BlueTemplar on Wed Nov 21, 2007 8:07 pm; edited 1 time in total


Back to top
Fyron
Galactic Guru


Joined: Aug 04, 2003
Location: CA, USA

PostPosted: Wed Nov 21, 2007 7:39 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Going from an empty husk to a full WP Opener ship is not good for gameplay.

Smarter than your average Texrak.


Back to top
BlueTemplar
Space Emperor


Joined: Mar 27, 2007

PostPosted: Wed Nov 21, 2007 8:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Then what do you propose?

Back to top
Carnak
Space Emperor


Joined: Sep 15, 2007

PostPosted: Thu Nov 22, 2007 4:42 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

It's hard to think of anything you could do to discourage retro series building but not impede normal upgrading of a ship. Legitimately refitting a troop ship to be a mine sweeper with new engines involves replacing all the parts except the bridge, crew quarters and life support, and it would be a shame to limit the game so this couldn't be done.

I was thinking perhaps make it so that only ships over a certain age could be refitted, but that would be stupid too. Last game I had to retrofit some explorers to troop ships as soon as they were build to deal with a neighbor which again would be a shame to prevent.


Back to top
Crissa
Space Emperor


Joined: Jan 07, 2006

PostPosted: Thu Nov 22, 2007 7:06 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I hit the 50% whenever I'm arming an unarmed ship, changing the engines on older ships to the top-tier (they've often been built while I didn't have good engines, or in construction, and the last few engine jumps in cost far faster, while they don't get researched any slower overall), lastly space yards - I start building them, and then I don't upgrade them while they're busy, and by the time I have the top space yard, it might cost more than the original ships did.

And especially when adding solar mechanics to a plain hull.

That last one is the only time I've needed more than one interim design.

-Crissa


Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Spaceempires.net Forum Index -> Balance Mod All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB
All logos and trademarks used on this site, all comments and stories posted for reading, all files hosted for download,
and all art work hosted for viewing are property of their respective owners; all the rest copyright 2003-2007 Nolan Kelly.
Syndicate news: SpaceEmpires.net News RSS Feed - Syndicate forums: SpaceEmpires.net Forums RSS Feed
Page Generation: 0.35 Seconds